Disposed

Yashpal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC12 Feb 2024W.P.(C)/1989/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRPF Pharmacist petitioners sought Non-Practicing Allowance parity with CRPF Doctors via writ of mandamus to the Ministry of Home Affairs, their representations having gone unaddressed. The respondents agreed to treat the petition as a representation and dispose of it within 12 weeks; the court disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Respondents to consider the petition as a representation and dispose of it within 12 weeks.

Yashpal Singh & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~47

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1989/2024

¶4

YASHPAL SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyarth Sinha and Ms. Chandana Debnath, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Deepak Tanwar, Govt. Pleader and Ms. Mishika Pandita, Mr. Rajdev Kumar and Mr. Hitesh Batra, Advs. with Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh (Legal Officer)

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶9

O R D E R % 12.02.2024

¶10

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

¶11

“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may please to allow this writ petition and may further be please to:

¶12

(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the ministry of Home Affairs to grant the benefits of Non-Practicing Allowance to the petitioners as parity with the Doctors of CRPF.

¶13

(ii) Pass any other order this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice.”

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2024 at 14:48:34

¶16

One of the submissions of Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Adv. for the petitioners is, despite representation for grant of NPA by the petitioners who are Pharmacist working in the CRPF, the same has not been considered.

¶17

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned Sr. Panel Counsel for the respondents on instructions states, they shall consider the present petition as a representation and dispose of the same within 12 weeks as an outer limit. The submission is taken on record.

¶18

The petition stands disposed of.

¶19

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶20

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 12, 2024 /jg

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2024 at 14:48:34

Yashpal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yashpal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyoti Vs Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors.

Vidya Vihar Cghs Ltd. & Ors. Vs Sh. Dharam Singh Yadav & Ors.

M/S Subhash Chand Kathuria Vs Punjab National Bank

Arjun Singh Vs Airport Authority of India and Ors.

Sanjeev Kumar Vs Union of India & Anr.

M/S Samraj Polytex Ltd. Vs Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Anr.

Pr.Commissioner of Income TAX-4, Vs M/S Hcil Comtel Ltd.

Jitender Kumar Vs the Lieutenant Governor and Anr.

Kuldeep Sharma Vs Union of India & Ors.

Manish Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Smt Rajesh Devi Vs Union of India & Ors.

Annu Khan Ct Gd Bsf Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ex Po Af Neeraj Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Nitin Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.