Dismissed

Kissandhan Agri Financial Service Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar Mittal

Delhi HC2 Jul 2024C.R.P./188/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi, on a revision petition filed under Article 115 of the Constitution and Section 151 CPC, dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the parties with liberty to file an appropriate application within one week.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw granted; revision petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate application within one week.

Kissandhan Agri Financial Service Pvt. Ltd. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~A-5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- C.R.P. 188/2024, CM APPL. 36067/2024 & CM APPL. 36068/2024 KISSANDHAN AGRI FINANCIAL SERVICE PVT LTD

¶4

..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arunav Tewari, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

ASHOK KUMAR MITTAL ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH O R D E R % 02.07.2024

¶7

The instant petition under Article 115 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking following reliefs:

¶8

“(a) Set aside the orders dated 03^rd June, 2024 passed by Sh. Sanjay Jindal, Ld. District Judge, Commercial Court, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, in Ex. Petition (Commercial) No. 71 of 2024;

¶9

(b) Stay the execution petition and the proceedings there of thereto till the present revision petition is disposed off and moreover till the curative petition filed by way of diary no. 17405/2024 is listed and considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court;

¶10

(c) Pass any other order or orders or writ or direction that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:54:32

¶12

After some length of arguments, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before the Court concern.

¶13

It is also submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that since the matter is listed for appointment of Bailiff, the Trial Court may be directed to defer the date of appointment of Bailiff till the decision on the objection regarding the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

¶14

Heard.

¶15

Leave granted.

¶16

The instant revision petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications with liberty to file an appropriate application before the Court concerned within one week.

¶17

A copy of this order be given Dasti under the signature of the Court Master to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶18

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J

¶19

JULY 2, 2024 rk/av

¶20

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶21

Kissandhan Agri Financial Service Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar Mittal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kissandhan Agri Financial Service Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar Mittal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited Vs Khaniya & Ors.

Sawhney Rubber Industries Vs Jawahar Prasad

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Pradeep Rana & Ors.

M/S Books Cybertech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Satyasai Panigrahy

Dr Utkarsh Pathak Vs Dr Vaisakh Sanal

Rajni Khanna Vs Sidharthan