Allowed

Direct News Private Limited v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 7-1 and Ors.

Delhi HC8 Feb 2024W.P.(C)/1862/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order refusing to exercise discretion under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act on the sole ground of a 20% pre-deposit mandate. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. LG Electronics India, the Court held that administrative circulars do not fetter the quasi-judicial authority's discretion to grant deposit orders of a les

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed; impugned order set aside and matter remitted to the first respondent to consider the application for stay afresh.

Direct News Private Limited Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income… — Income Tax | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~42

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1862/2024

¶4

DIRECT NEWS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Singh Rawat and Mr. Vikramaditya Bhaskar, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 7-1 AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal S, Adv.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶9

O R D E R % 08.02.2024 CM APPL. 7755/2024 (Ex.)

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application is disposed of.

¶12

W.P.(C) 1862/2024

¶13

The solitary grievance which is raised in the present writ petition is with respect to the manner in which the application under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“ Act ”] has come to be treated. As is ex facie evident, the respondent no.1 has proceeded on the assumption that the assessee is invariably and without exception liable to pre-deposit 20% of the outstanding demand.

¶14

The aforesaid view is premised on a reading of OM No. 404/72/93-ITCC dated 31 July 2017 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“ CBDT ”] with respect to Instruction No. 1914 dated 21 March 1996 and which the respondents appear to read as mandating a

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:39:14

¶17

pre-deposit of 20% of the outstanding demand before the powers conferred by Section 220(6) of the Act could be exercised.

¶18

The aforesaid view will clearly not sustain in light of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. LG Electronics India (P) Ltd. [(2018) 18 SCC 447]. While dealing with the aforesaid issue the Supreme Court has held as under:-

¶19

“ 2. Having heard Shri Vikramjit Banerjee, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the appellant, and giving credence to the fact that he has argued before us that the administrative circular will not operate as a fetter on the Commissioner since it is a quasi-judicial authority, we only need to clarify that in all cases like the present, it will be open to the authorities, on the facts of individual cases, to grant deposit orders of a lesser amount than 20%, pending appeal.”

¶20

In view of the above and the fact that the legal position is conceded, we allow the instant writ petition and set aside the impugned order dated 27 December 2023. The matter shall consequently stand remitted to the first respondent to consider the application for stay afresh bearing in mind the observations appearing hereinabove. All rights and contentions of respective parties are kept open.

¶21

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

¶22

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. FEBRUARY 8, 2024/ neha

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:39:14

Direct News Private Limited v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 7-1 and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Direct News Private Limited v. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 7-1 and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

La Tropicana Residents Association Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Rajnish Mishra and Ors. Vs Union of India and Anr.

Aditya Malhotra & Anr. Vs Canara Bank & Anr.

Neeraj Paper Marketing Limited Vs Sales Tax Officer Class Ii, New Delhi

Jyoti Vs Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors.

Vidya Vihar Cghs Ltd. & Ors. Vs Sh. Dharam Singh Yadav & Ors.

M/S Subhash Chand Kathuria Vs Punjab National Bank

Arjun Singh Vs Airport Authority of India and Ors.

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 Vs Relx Inc.

Pr. Commissioner Oflncome Tax, Central- II Vs M/S Trn Energy Pvt. Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)- 3 Vs Sh . Charchit Agarwal

Times Internet Limited Vs Pcit, DELHI-7 and Ors.

Ms Nokia Solutions and Networks India Private Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 4 & Anr.

Boston Scientific India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.