The court allowed the petition directing the Union of India to consider the petitioner's claim for increments within eight weeks, applying the Supreme Court decision in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P.Mundinamani & Ors., and to pass a reasoned order.
Direction to consider the claim within eight weeks and pass a reasoned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
Date of decision: 20.12.2024
NARINDER KUMAR BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Tiwari, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, SPC with Mr. Kanishk Kharbanda and Mr. Avinash Singh, Advs. and AC Raj Kumar, SI Praladh and SI Amit Kumar, CISF.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
CM APPL. 74898/2024
W.P.(C) 17606/2024
Signature Not Verified
Page 1 of 3
Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 17606/2024 By:NEELAM Signing Da te:2 1.12.2024 16:02:42
present, the petitioner will be satisfied, in case the respondents are directed to examine his claims in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. (supra) in a timebound manner.
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 3
Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 17606/2024 By:NEELAM Signing Da te:2 1.12.2024 16:02:42
respondents, it will be open for him to seek legal recourse as permissible in law.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
DECEMBER 20, 2024 /ss/sk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
Page 3 of 3
Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 17606/2024 By:NEELAM Signing Da te:2 1.12.2024 16:02:42
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed directing the respondents to decide the petitioner's claim for increments in a time-bound manner.
Whether the respondents should consider the petitioner's claim in the light of the Supreme Court decision in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P.Mundinamani & Ors.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P.Mundinamani & Ors.Applied¶15
Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P.Mundinamani & Ors. 2023 SCC OnLine SC 401 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narinder Kumar Bharadwaj
Union of India
Answered No. 1
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
