Disposed

Gagandeep Singh Sawhney v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Authorized Representative and Ors.

Delhi HC11 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/176/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of two writ petitions challenging an order under Section 338 and a show-cause notice under Sections 341(1) and 343 of the DMC Act, 1957. The Court allowed the liberty to file appeals before ATMCD and directed maintenance of status quo for two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed; liberty to file appeal before ATMCD maintained; status quo ordered for 2 weeks.

Gagandeep Singh Sawhney Vs Municipal… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4 & 5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 176/2024 GAGANDEEP SINGH SAWHNEY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Bajpai, Sr. Adv. along with Shubham Saxena, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND ORS. ..... Respondents

¶6

Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC for MCD.

¶7

5 + W.P.(C) 239/2024 GAGANDEEP SINGH SAWHNEY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Bajpai, Sr. Adv. along with Shubham Saxena, Advs.

¶8

versus

¶9

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC for MCD.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R

¶12

% 11.01.2024

¶13

These petitions assail an order dated 08.11.2023 passed under Section 338 of the DMC Act, 1957 (in W.P.(C) 239/2024) as also a Show-cause notice dated 06.12.2023 under Section 341(1) and 343of the DMC Act, 1957 (in W.P.(C) 176/2024)

¶14

Admittedly, the aforesaid orders are appealable before ATMCD. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings before ATMCD which shall be duly considered by the ATMCD in accordance with law.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 13:04:46

¶17

In the interregnum, no precipitative or coercive action shall be taken by the MCD for a period of 2 weeks from today, and status quo shall be maintained by the parties in respect of the property in question.

¶18

The present petitions stand disposed of in the above terms.

¶19

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶20

JANUARY 11, 2024/AT

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 13:04:46

Gagandeep Singh Sawhney v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Authorized Representative and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gagandeep Singh Sawhney v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Authorized Representative and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

No 948664S Sergeant Kundan Vs Union of India and Ors.

969623L Sgt Bajinder Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. Vs Subhas Chandra Pandey

Surender Kumar Vs MCD & Ors.

Lal Chand Ranwa & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sandeep Singh Vs Government of NCT O Delhi & Ors.F

Mahendra Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Roop Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Surender Kumar Vs MCD & Ors.

Ram Kumar Goyal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Rakesh Kumar and Anr. Vs MCD

Chander Shekhar Sindhi Vs Lt. Governor & Anr.

Naman Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Karix Mobile Pvt. Ltd. Vs Wlc College India Ltd.