A writ petition seeking direction to decide a representation was dismissed as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner after the respondent communicated a decision.
案件受理费 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Mr. Hardik Bedi, GP with DC Hemendra Singh, Law BSF
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
“In view of the foregoing facts and circumstances, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:35:04
dated March 29, 2023 addressed to the petitioner whereby, the said representation has been decided.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
FEBRUARY 8, 2024/So..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:35:04
RAJINDER MANI
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
