Anil Kumar v. Ito, Ward - 61.1 & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew income-tax writ petition without prejudice. Court dismissed petition and disposed of pending application.
What the court decided
$~44
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 17244/2024 CM APPL. 73367/2024 ANIL KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
versus
ITO, WARD - 61.1 & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Debesh Panda, SSC Ms. Zehra Khan, Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, JSCs Mr. Kanishk Aggarwal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R
% 13.12.2024 1. After some arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the above captioned petition while reserving all rights and contentions.
- Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application also stands disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anil Kumar
- respondent
ITO, Ward - 61.1 & Anr.
Coram
VIBHU BAKHRU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court