The Court disposed of a withdrawn writ petition regarding grievances made by the petitioner. Directions were issued to forward complaints to the Competent Authority for consideration.
Forward complaints to Competent Authority for inquiry and decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~137
BRIJ BHUSHAN SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Srivastava, Ms. Muskan Sharma and Ms. Shreya Sharma, Advocates.
versus
THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE HEADQUARTERS .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates for DSJ.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 13.12.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
DECEMBER 13, 2024/shivam
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:13:40
Brij Bhushan Sharma
The Principal District and Sessions Judge Headquarters
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
