A two-line order where the Acting Chief Justice dismissed a writ petition after the petitioner's counsel wished to withdraw it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ACTION FOR VIGILANCE AND KNOWLEGE FOR EMPOWERMENT (A.V.A.K.E) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Borwankar, Advocate (Through VC)
versus
MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS & ORS
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Varun Agarwal, Advocate for R-1, R- 4 & R-11 Mr. Anshuman Sharma and Mr. Azaz Ahmed, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for R-6 Mr. Raju Dudani and Mr. Rajdeep Singh Rao, Advocates for R-8
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R
% 10.04.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
APRIL 10, 2024/ rhc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:48:13
ACTION FOR VIGILANCE AND KNOWLEGE FOR EMPOWERMENT (A.V.A.K.E)
MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
