Dismissed

Sanjay Rawat v. Oberoi Flight Services Delhi Eih Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi HC9 Dec 2024W.P.(C)/16991/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought transfer to Delhi. Respondents argued non-maintainability against a private entity. Petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition. Court allowed exemption CM application and dismissed the writ petition and stay application as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and stay application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.

Sanjay Rawat Vs Oberoi Flight Services Delhi Eih Ltd… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~80

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 16991/2024

¶4

SANJAY RAWAT .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sherawat, Advocate with petitioner in person

¶6

versus

¶7

OBEROI FLIGHT SERVICES DELHI EIH LTD. & ANR.

¶8

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Narendra M. Sharma and Ms. Shubjangi Tiwari, Advocate for R1 Mohd. Irsad ASC with Ms. Nasreen and Mr. Kunal Rai, Advocate for R2

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶11

% 09.12.2024

¶12

[ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

¶13

CM APPL. 71926/2024 (exemption)

¶14

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶15

W.P.(C) 16991/2024 & CM APPL. 71927/2024 (stay)

¶16

The petitioner has sought issuance of mandamus to the respondents to repost and transfer him to his hometown at Delhi. Learned counsel for respondents at the outset submits that the writ petition is not maintainable against the respondent no. 1, which is a private entity. It is further pointed out by learned counsel that the petitioner has concealed vital facts and even otherwise, in Calcutta also, there are competent and rather much cheaper medical facilities for son of the petitioner.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:33:31

¶18

After addressing partly, learned counsel for petitioner on instruction of his client present in the court room seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition, disclosing complete facts.

¶19

The petition as well as accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.

¶20

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶21

DECEMBER 9, 2024/as

¶22

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶23

Sanjay Rawat v. Oberoi Flight Services Delhi Eih Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Rawat v. Oberoi Flight Services Delhi Eih Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Davinder Bajaj Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(3), Delhi & Ors.

Vmvs Textiles Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 26(1) & Anr.

Mr. J. Chakraborty Vs M/S Gail (India) Limited & Anr.

Ashish Kumar Shukla Proprietor S.P.S Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

Ex Rect Bhuw Aneshw Ar Sah Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sh Jiwachh Prasad Roy Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

M/S Mohit International through, Prop. Harsh Anil Kumar Vasant Vs Commissioner of Customs Air Cargo Complex (Exports) & Ors.

Echo International and Ors. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs Import and Anr.

Mr. J. Chakraborty Vs M/S Gail (India) Limited & Anr.

Om Prakash Chauhan (Thr. Lrs) Vs Union of India and Others

Ram Jeet and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ajay Kumar Gulati Vs State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur

Sujata Kumari @ Sujata Vs Delhi Transport Corporation

Sh Rajender Kumar Ola & Ors. Vs Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya and Ors.