The petition was withdrawn by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner with a prayer for liberty to file a fresh petition with appropriate prayers. The court has granted this liberty and consequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyarth Sinha and Ms. Chandana Debnath, Advocates versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, SPC with Mr. Hilal Haider, GP
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 06.02.2024
Mr. Bhargava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with appropriate prayers. With liberty in accordance of law, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
FEBRUARY 6, 2024/So
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:36:09
BIJAY KUMAR DUBEY
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
