Disposed

Dr Deepok Gogoi v. Union of India

Delhi HC4 Dec 2024W.P.(C)/16709/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought directions for the respondent to decide a representation regarding Court of Inquiry findings. The Court directed the respondent to consider the representation and pass a speaking order within eight weeks, clarifying that no opinion was expressed on the merits of the underlying facts.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider representation and pass a speaking order within eight weeks.

Dr Deepok Gogoi Vs Union of India — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~73

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of decision: 04.12.2024

¶4

W.P.(C) 16709/2024

¶5

DR DEEPOK GOGOI .....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Deepshikha, Adv.

¶7

versus

¶8

UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, Adv.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶11

NAVIN CHAWLA, J (ORAL)

¶12

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a limited prayer of seeking directions to the respondent to decide the representation dated 02.08.2023 by way of a reasoned order in a time bound manner. The said representation has been made by the petitioner against the findings of fact returned by the Court of Inquiry in its report dated 14.02.2023.

¶13

Issue notice.

¶14

Mr. Amit Tiwari, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. He submits that the representation of the petitioner has, in fact, not been received at the Directorate General Office of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force (ITBP). He submits that without prejudice to the above, the representation made by the petitioner, which is annexed as Annexure P4 to this petition, shall be duly

¶15

Signature Not Verified

¶16

Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 16709/2024 By:NEELAM Signing Da te:0 6.12.2024 14:42:38

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

considered by the Competent Authority before passing any further orders based on the Court of Inquiry.

¶19

The respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereon within a period of eight weeks from today.

¶20

We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on findings of fact returned by the Court of Inquiry in its report dated 14.02.2023 or the merits of the representation of the petitioner. The same shall be considered by the respondent in accordance with law.

¶21

The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶22

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶23

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶24

DECEMBER 4, 2024 SU/SK/SJ

¶25

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶26

Signature Not Verified

¶27

Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 16709/2024 By:NEELAM Signing Da te:0 6.12.2024 14:42:38

¶28

Page 2 of 2

Dr Deepok Gogoi v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Deepok Gogoi v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh Raj Kumar Singh Rathore Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Sharma Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Kamlesh Kumar Sindhwani Vs Delhi Pollution Control Committee and Anr.

Ajay Jain Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 59(1),DELHI & Ors.

Ritu Singhal Vs Lions Public School and Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs SL-3939F Col Mpc Rao (Retd.)

Abhishek Monga Vs Delhi Develoment Authority

Ca. Munish Mehta Vs Board of Discipline of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Sarvesh Tomar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Arjun Bapari Vs Union of India & Ors.

Dr Vinod Kumari Vs Sashastra Seema Bal and Anr.

Satyavir Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Vs the Director General Central Indusrial Security Force and Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs Lt Col Aa Godbole (Retd.)