The petition seeking seniority promotion was disposed of without expressing an opinion on merits, directing respondents to consider the petition as a representation and decide within eight weeks; aggrieved parties may challenge the resulting order.
Direction to consider petition as representation and decide within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
.....Petitioner Through: Mr.Ravi Kumar, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through: Mr.Kshitij Chhabra, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr.Rishav Dubey, GP, Mr.Ajay Pal, AC/CRPF & Mr.Shiv Kr. Singh, SI/CRPF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R % 02.12.2024 CM APPL. 69947/2024 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 16541/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:21:40
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
DECEMBER 2, 2024 /rv/DG
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:21:40
Surajkaran Meena
Union of India
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
