Disposed

Raju v. New Delhi Municipal Council Tvc & Ors.

Delhi HC5 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/16413/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Street vendor sought direction to NDMC's Town Vending Committee to conduct a survey and include him on the basis of his documents, and not to be disturbed from his vending site. Respondents stated a representation would be considered. Petition disposed of with liberty to make representation.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioner to make representation to TVC, to be considered in accordance with law as assured by respondents.

Raju Vs New Delhi Municipal Council Tvc & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 16413/2023

¶4

RAJU

¶5

..... Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr Satish Kumar Tripathi, Advocate.

¶7

versus

¶8

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL TVC & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Chetanya Singh, Advocate for R-1 & 2/NDMC. Ms Rachita Garg, Advocate for SHO/GNCTD/R-2.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 05.01.2024

¶10

CM APPL. 66033/2023

¶11

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

The application stands disposed of.

¶13

W.P.(C) 16413/2023

¶14

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:

¶15

“a. admit the writ petition against the respondent.

¶16

b. Direct the TVC of NDMC to carry out and conduct the survey of the petitioner on the basis of document in his possession by newly constituted TVC of NDMC in a time bound manner as the per the mandate of Act, Rules and Scheme without any arbitrariness and colourable exercise of power and that the petitioner is not found vending at his vending place at the time of survey may not be sole ground to reject his candidature to the claim of his vending space.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:18:02

¶19

c. That direction may be issued against respondent No 2 & 3 that the petitioner may not be disturbed from the present vending site at (more particularly as mentioned in the Memo of Parties) as same does not falls under No hawking/ No Vending Zone till such time the TVC of NDMC will complete the exercise of proper verification and final allotment of vending site to him as per the provisions of the Act as petitioner is existing and verified street vendor.”

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been operating as a street vendor from a site opposite Shop No.59, Vegetable Market, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi. He states that the description of the working site as stated in the memo of parties is erroneous. The petitioner, essentially, seeks that a survey be conducted and the petitioner be included on the basis of the documents in his possession as he has since been ousted from the working site. 5. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner may make a representation to the Town Vending Committee (TVC) and the representation shall be considered in accordance with law.

¶21

In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed.

¶22

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶23

The petitioner would be at liberty to make a representation to the TVC and his representation would be considered as assured by the learned counsel for the respondents.

¶24

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶25

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶26

JANUARY 5, 2024 RK

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:18:02

Raju v. New Delhi Municipal Council Tvc & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju v. New Delhi Municipal Council Tvc & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asstt Comdt Rahul Bhasharkar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Asian Private Iti Vs Directorate General of Training

Mehmoodul Hasan Vs Govt. Ofnct of Delhi and Anr.

Amar Singh Bhatia & Anr. Vs Sir Ganga Ram Hospital & Ors.

Bharat Bhushan Jindal Vs Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-12 & Anr.

Keshav Dutt Upreti Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mohan Singh Bisht Vs Union of India & Ors.

Lalit Mohan Kabdwal Vs Union of India through Its Secretary & Ors.

Ramchandra Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Mohd. Afzal Vs New Delhi Municipal Council-Tvc & Ors.

Hari Shankar Vs M/S Tagore International School

The Registrar General (Now Secretary General) Supreme Court of India Vs Phaguni Nilesh Lal & Anr.