any cause against DMRC in the present writ petition as there is an arbitration clause incorporated in the agreement executed between the Petitioners and DMRC and the writ petition is not maintainable against the said Respondent. Learned counsel for DDA, as noted above, has taken a position that it is the LAC which has to first take a decision in the matter. 11. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of by directing LAC to treat this writ petition as a representation and take a decision on the issues flagged by the Petitioners relating to allotment of alternate plot in view of the land surrendered by them in favour of DMRC. The decision shall be taken within eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order by the LAC. In case, the decision is in favour of the Petitioners, process shall be initiated by the concerned Authorities for allotment of land and in case the decision is otherwise, a reasoned and speaking order shall be passed which will be communicated to the Petitioners within one week from the decision and it shall be open to the Petitioners to take recourse to legal remedies, if so advised. It is also made clear that this Court has not entered into the issue of maintainability of the writ petition qua DMRC in light of the arbitration clause in the agreement executed between the Petitioners and DMRC.
