Disposed

Krishan Kumar Dahiya v. the Secretary (P), Dopt & Anr.

Delhi HC5 Feb 2024W.P.(C)/1573/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's applications for membership to the Civil Services Officers’ Institute and take a decision within six weeks. The writ petition was disposed of with a clarification that no observations were made on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider application for membership within six weeks.

Krishan Kumar Dahiya Vs the Secretary (P)… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~72

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1573/2024

¶4

KRISHAN KUMAR DAHIYA ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu and Mr. Drona Negi, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE SECRETARY (P), DOPT & ANR. ..... Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Anshuman Sharma and Mr. Azaz Ahmed, Advocates for R-2.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 05.02.2024 CM APPL. 6545/2024 (Exemption)

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

W.P.(C) 1573/2024

¶14

The Petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to Respondent/Civil Services Officers’ Institute (CSOI) to consider the application dated 27.09.2012 and the representations dated 11.08.2023 and 12.12.2023 for grant of membership to the Petitioner.

¶15

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has placed reliance upon a Judgment dated 06.04.2022 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.383/2019 upholding the Judgment dated 14.02.2019 passed by a Single Bench of this Court passed in W.P.(C.) No.2690/2017 wherein the CSOI was directed to consider the application of the Petitioner therein, who

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:37:39

¶17

was appointed to the post of a Judicial Member in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and pass appropriate Orders.

¶18

The Respondents are directed to consider the application dated 27.09.2012 and the representations dated 11.08.2023 and 12.12.2023 given by the Petitioner and take a decision for grant of membership within a period of six weeks from today.

¶19

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case.

¶20

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 5, 2024 S. Zakir

¶22

Krishan Kumar Dahiya v. the Secretary (P), Dopt & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan Kumar Dahiya v. the Secretary (P), Dopt & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Delhi Public School Mathura Road Vs Union of India and Anr.

Meenakshi Singh Vs Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Ashok Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Mohd Wasim Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Reach Dredging Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ashok Kumar Madiyan Vs Government of N.C.T of Delhi

Union Bank of India Vs Suman Rani

Smt. Sunita Vs Union of India & Ors.

Meenakshi Singh Vs Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Priyal Gupta Vs Union of India & Ors.

New India Structures Private Limited Vs National Highway Authority of India through Its Chairman & Ors.

S Vs the Union of India & Ors.

Ms. (a) Vs Delhi Cantonment General Hospital & Ors.

Neha Aggarwal Vs Sub-Registrar Vi-a(Pitampura) & Ors.