Petitioner challenged a transfer order to the 6th Battalion, Chhapra, Bihar, citing ongoing medical treatment. Court directed respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide within two weeks, without interim relief or opinion on merits, then disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 08.11.2024
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Vatsal Joshi, SPC, Mr.Vasuchit Anand, GP with DC-Jag Devender Singh.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 65271/2024 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 15543/2024 & CM APPL. 65270/2024
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 15543/2024 Page 1 of 2
Digitally Signed By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 1.11.2024 19:19:04
grant an interview to the petitioner or to decide on his representation, the learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, submits that an interview has been granted to the petitioner.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
NOVEMBER 8, 2024/Arya/DG
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 15543/2024 Page 2 of 2
Digitally Signed By:SUNIL Signing Da te:1 1.11.2024 19:19:04
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should consider the petition contents as a representation regarding the petitioner's transfer and medical condition and decide it within two weeks?
Chain Singh
Union of India and Ors
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
