Petitioner sought to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. The High Court allowed the withdrawal with the prayed liberty and disposed of pending applications as well.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~75
GAURAV YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Kumar Singh, Advocate.
versus
DIRECTOR CGHS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC for Respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 15.07.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
JULY 15, 2024
B.S. Rohella
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:31:26
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and OthersReferred¶10
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others, (1997) 3 SCC 261 · Who else cites this
Gaurav Yadav
Director CGHS & Ors.
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
