Disposed

Sadanand Paswan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Delhi HC22 Apr 2024W.P.(C)/14779/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A street vendor holding a Certificate of Vending sought protection from removal and a direction that he be treated as a stationary vendor. The court directed that he not be interdicted in vending subject to COV conditions, and that his representation before the Town Vending Committee be considered.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner not to be interdicted from vending subject to COV terms; representation dated 29.09.2023 to be considered by TVC at appropriate stage.

Sadanand Paswan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 14779/2023 CM APPL. 58814/2023 CM APPL. 4472/2024 CM APPL. 4473/2024

¶4

SADANAND PASWAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek saxena, Mr. Singh Nishant Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Vaibhav Patel, Mr. Saurav Dewal, Mr. Munish, Mr. Rahul Pratap Singh, Ms. Mumtaz Shaikh and Ms. Kamini, Advs. versus

¶5

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND OTHERS

¶6

..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shilpa Ohri, Standing Counsel for MCD. Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel with Mr. Jatin Dua, Adv. for GNCTD.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶9

O R D E R % 22.04.2024

¶10

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia , praying as

¶11

under:

¶12

“A. Pass an Order directing the respondents to ensure that that the petitioner is allowed to peacefully vend in terms of his vending site i.e. ward S-11 E, SHAHDARA SOUTH ZONE Delhi, without any Let or hindrance being cause by any public official.

¶13

B. Pass an order directing the respondents, their officials, their agents etc. be restrained from harassing-dislocating-removing the petitioners from peacefully vending at his vending site.

¶14

C. Pass an order directing the SHO P.S. PANDAV NAGAR to ensure that the petitioner street vendor shall not be forcefully and illegally be removed from his vending site.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2024 at 12:22:08

¶17

D. Pass an order directing the respondent Government of NCT of Delhi to comply and effectuate the provision of section 20 of the STREET VENDORS (PROTECTION OF LIVELIHOOD AND REGULATIONS OF STREET VENDING) ACT, 2014, and make the dispute redressal committee functional within the stipulated time period.

¶18

E. Pass an order directing the town vending committee to decide the representation within the stipulated time period as the petitioner is facing several problems due to the illegal act of the respondents to run his livelihood.

¶19

F. Pass an such order that no street vendor shall be evicted from his vending site till the formation of the vending zone.”

¶20

The petitioner claims that he has been carrying on vending activities from a site located at Ward S-11 E, Shahdara South Zone, Delhi. The petitioner has also been issued a Certificate of Vending (COV) indicating that his vending area as Shahdara South Zone, Ward – 11E. The petitioner is essentially aggrieved on account of the conditions of the COV which require him to not carry on vending activities at a particular site for more than a particular time. The petitioner claims that he is required to be treated as “stationary vendor” and not as a “mobile vendor”. The petitioner has also filed a representation dated 29.09.2023 to the Town Vending Committee in this regard.

¶21

It is contended by learned counsel for the respondent that at this present stage, the petitioner cannot be treated as a “stationary vendor” as no specific site has been allocated to him. She states that after the survey is complete, the second Town Vending Committee (TVC-II) would be constituted and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi would prepare a vending plan in consultation with TVC-II. At that stage, the question of vending at a fixed place may be considered.

¶22

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2024 at 12:22:08

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation be kept pending and be considered at an appropriate stage. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the same. In view of the above, we dispose of the petition by directing that the petitioner shall not interdicted or interfered with in carrying on its vending activities subject to the petitioner complying with the terms and conditions of the COV. The representation dated 29.09.2023 made by the petitioner [which is annexed at Annexure P3] shall be considered by the concerned TVC at an appropriate stage.

¶24

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶25

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶26

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶27

APRIL 22, 2024/r

¶28

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶29

Sadanand Paswan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadanand Paswan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Qaisar Sultana (Sr. Citizen) and Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Dinesh Yadav & Anr. Vs Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Ors.

Vlcc Health Care Limited Vs Income Tax Officer & Ors.

Preeti Singh Vs Union of India

Abhilasha Teacher Training School Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Jyoti Deep Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S B.L. Construction Company Vs Sukhdev and Ors.

D N Gandhi Vs Union of India & Anr.

Uttam Kumar & Ors. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Mannu Singh Yadav and Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Balbir Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Surendra Singh Vs Govt.of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shailendra Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Kashmir Harvard Educational Institute Vs President and Fellows of Harvard College