Disposed

Bharat Swai v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Delhi HC22 Apr 2024W.P.(C)/14777/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court issued an order allowing a street vendor to conduct vending activities strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending, restraining authorities from interference. The court directed authorities to process a pending representation regarding seized articles within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents not to interfere with petitioner's vending activities if carried on strictly per COV terms; directing authorities to dispose of petitioner's representation within four weeks.

Bharat Swai Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 14777/2023 CM APPL. 58810/2023 CM APPL. 4545/2024 CM APPL. 4546/2024 CM APPL. 4547/2024 CM APPL. 4548/2024 BHARAT SWAI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek saxena, Mr. Singh Nishant Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Vaibhav Patel, Mr. Saurav Dewal, Mr. Munish, Mr. Rahul Pratap Singh, Ms. Mumtaz Shaikh and Ms. Kamini, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND OTHERS

¶6

..... Respondents

¶7

Through: Ms. Tajinder Virdi, Standing Counsel for MCD.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶10

O R D E R % 22.04.2024

¶11

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia , praying as

¶12

under:

¶13

“A. Pass an Order directing the respondents to ensure that that the petitioner is allowed to peacefully vend in terms of his vending site i.e. south zone ward S-70 New Delhi, without any Let or hindrance being cause by any public official.

¶14

B. Pass an order directing the respondents, their officials, their agents etc. be restrained from harassing-dislocating-removing the petitioners from peacefully vending at his vending site.

¶15

C. Pass an order directing the SHO P.S. MEHRAULI to ensure that the petitioner street vendor shall not be forcefully and illegally be removed from his vending site.

¶16

D. Pass an order directing the respondent Government of NCT of Delhi to comply and effectuate the provision of section 20 of the STREET VENDORS (PROTECTION OF LIVELIHOOD AND REGULATIONS OF STREET VENDING) ACT, 2014, and make the dispute redressal committee functional within the stipulated time period.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2024 at 12:24:31

¶18

E. Pass and order directing the respondent no. 1 to release the articles of the petitioner as the petitioner is facing several problems to run his livelihood.

¶19

F. Pass an such order that no street vendor shall be evicted from his vending site till the formation of the vending zone.”

¶20

The petitioner is a street vendor and claims that he has been vending in South Zone, Ward S-70 [situated in Chattarpur, New Delhi] since 200708. The petitioner has also filed a Certificate of Vending (COV) which indicates that he is carrying on vending in the said area. The petitioner is aggrieved on account of an incident occurred on 02.09.2023. The petitioner claims that on the said date, officials of respondent no.1 along with respondent no.2 had visited the said site and illegally seized articles of the petitioner. The petitioner claims that he had shown them the COV but they had not paid any heed to the same and had seized all his articles. He states that the concerned authorities are now demanding a sum of Rs.27,900/- for release of the same.

¶21

Respondent no. 1 has filed a status report indicating that the petitioner was removed and his goods were seized as he was not vending in accordance with the terms and conditions of the COV.

¶22

The petitioner has not been allocated any designated site and, therefore, is not permitted to vend at any particular spot for more than 30 minutes. It is stated that in the present case, the petitioner has installed a wooden counter at the footpath CDR Chowk, Chattarpur, New Delhi and had encroached upon the pavement, and is also inconveniencing the pedestrians.

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has made a representation regarding release of the articles and is willing to carry

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2024 at 12:24:31

¶26

on vending activities in accordance with the terms and conditions of the COV. He submits that the petitioner does not have the wherewithal to pay the penalty of Rs.27,900/- and has accordingly, requested the concerned authorities to waive the same.

¶27

In view of the above, we consider it apposite to dispose of the petition by directing that the respondents will not interfere with the petitioner’s vending activities subject to the same being carried on strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the COV.

¶28

It is also noted that the concerned authorities were directed to dispose of the petitioner’s representation [which is annexed as Annexure P3 to the present petition] within a period of four weeks from the date of the said order (10.11.2023). This Court is informed that the said order has not been complied with.

¶29

The concerned authorities will take up the representation on urgent basis. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that there has been some delay in compliance with the said order, but it will definitely be complied with within a period of two weeks from date. In view of the said statement, this Court is refraining from passing any further orders in this regard. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶30

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶31

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J APRIL 22, 2024/r Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶32

Bharat Swai v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharat Swai v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Qaisar Sultana (Sr. Citizen) and Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Dinesh Yadav & Anr. Vs Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Ors.

Vlcc Health Care Limited Vs Income Tax Officer & Ors.

Preeti Singh Vs Union of India

Abhilasha Teacher Training School Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Jyoti Deep Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S B.L. Construction Company Vs Sukhdev and Ors.

D N Gandhi Vs Union of India & Anr.

Uttam Kumar & Ors. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Mannu Singh Yadav and Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Balbir Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Surendra Singh Vs Govt.of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shailendra Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Kashmir Harvard Educational Institute Vs President and Fellows of Harvard College