On receipt of a cancellation order, the petitioner chose to approach the Civil Court. With this liberty, the present writ petition and pending applications were disposed of without deciding the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
DDY SERVICES ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms.Bammi with Ms.Nikhil Batra, Advocates.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manu Chaturvedi, standing counsel for MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 09.02.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024 KA
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:39:17
DDY Services
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
