Disposed

Sudeep Kumar Jain v. High Court of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC16 Dec 2024W.P.(C)/13751/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking promotion of the petitioner to Senior Stenographer. The court found the matter infructuous as the petitioner was promoted during pendency, and his plea for ante-dating was rejected, while reserving liberty to challenge the rejection and other delay-related issues.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed; liberty to challenge the order passed on the representation regarding ante-dating of promotion.

Sudeep Kumar Jain Vs High Court of Delhi & Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~34

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13751/2019 and CM APPL. 46388/2023

¶4

SUDEEP KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anu Bagai and Mr. Shoumik Chowdary, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Dr. Amit George, Ms. Ibansara Sylemlieh, Mr. Adhishwar Suri, Ms. Suparna Jain and Ms. Rupam Jha, Advocates for Respondent No.2.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 16.12.2024

¶11

This writ petition was preferred on behalf of the Petitioner for a direction to Respondent No.2 to constitute a Departmental Promotion Committee and to consider the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Stenographer in Delhi Judicial Academy w.e.f May, 2017 with all consequential benefits.

¶12

It is a common case between the parties that during the pendency of the writ petition, Petitioner has been considered for promotion and granted promotion to the post of Senior Stenographer and the narrow issue that now remains is with respect to the date from which the promotion will take effect.

¶13

W.P.(C) 13751/2019

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:11

¶16

Ms. Anu Bagai, learned counsel for the Respondent No.1/Delhi High Court submits that Petitioner had made a representation for ante-dating his promotion but the same has been rejected by the Administrative Committee of this Court and therefore, this writ petition is rendered infructuous.

¶17

In my view, there is merit in the submission of Ms. Bagai. This writ petition was filed for a limited direction to constitute a DPC and consider the case of the Petitioner as Senior Stenographer. During the pendency, Petitioner has been promoted and his representation for ante-dating the promotion has been rejected and therefore, this writ petition is infructuous.

¶18

The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the order passed on his representation as well raise all other issues flagged in the present writ petition with respect to grant of promotion from the date of vacancy since it is alleged by the Petitioner that for no fault of his, the skill test was delayed which impacted his promotion on time.

¶19

Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶20

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶21

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶22

DECEMBER 16, 2024 YA

¶23

W.P.(C) 13751/2019

¶24

Page 2 of 2

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:11

Sudeep Kumar Jain v. High Court of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudeep Kumar Jain v. High Court of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Enterprises (through Its Sole Proprietor Rajiv Daga) Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax

State of Haryana Vs B M Institute of Engineering & Technology & Anr.

Anil Bhasin Vs Gaurav Gogna and Others

Gourav Vs Union of India & Ors.

Delhi Brush Manufacturing Association Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Jagdish Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Smt. Neelam Sathi Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Shri Upkar Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dalip Singh Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Om Prakash Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mahendar Pal Vs Union of India & Ors.

Dr Ashwani Kumar Vs M. L. Khanna Dav Public School and Ors.

Ashish Vs Canara Bank

Dr. Mahendra Singh Vs Kalindi College & Anr.