Petitioner sought directions to the Respondents for compliance of a CIC order. Respondent counsel agreed to dispatch the RTI response. The Court disposed of the writ petition based on the statement of counsel.
Writ petition disposed of without specific directions as the respondent agreed to provide the RTI response.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAVINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Kukkar, Mr. Kunal Choudhary, Advocates
Versus
DDA LAND MANAGEMENT SOUTH ZONE & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Ms. Vasudha Saini, Ms. Harshita Rai, Advocates for DDA
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 15.10.2024
1 “CIC”
2 “RTI Act”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 20:31:09
record and the Respondents are held to be bound by the same. The copy of the said response of the Respondents shall be also emailed to counsel for the Petitioner.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
OCTOBER 15, 2024/ab
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 20:31:09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant directions for compliance of the Central Information Commission's order dated 28th June 2024 regarding the RTI application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravinder Singh
DDA Land Management South Zone & Anr.
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
