Allowed

Dr. Yogieta S Mehra v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC27 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/13630/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a writ petition seeking arrears of pay following promotions granted to the petitioner, a University of Delhi employee. Dismissing the defense of budgetary constraints, the Court directed the release of arrears within three months of formalizing modalities.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release arrears within 3 months of formalizing modalities; representation for interest left open.

Dr. Yogieta S Mehra Vs Lt. Governor of Delhi… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~82

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision: 27^th September, 2024

¶4

W.P.(C) 13630/2024

¶5

DR. YOGIETA S MEHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nizamuddin, Advocate for Mr. V. Balaji, Advocate for Respondent No.2/DoE. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal and Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Advocates for Respondent No.3/DU. Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Ms. Ann Joseph and Ms.Mansi Jain, Advocates for Respondent No.4/DDU College.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶10

JUDGMENT

¶11

JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

¶12

This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner for a direction to Respondents No.1, 2 and 4 to release the arrears of pay to the Petitioner upon fixation of her pay vide Office Orders dated 13.12.2021 and 18.04.2022, on account of promotions of the Petitioner from the post of Assistant Professor (AGP Rs.7000/-) to Assistant Professor (AGP Rs.8000/-); from Assistant Professor (AGP Rs.8000/-) to Associate Professor and finally, promotion as Professor along with interest @18% per annum from the date payments fell due till actual payment.

¶13

Signature Not Verified

¶14

W.P.(C) 13630/2024

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.10.2024 18:56:23

¶17

Shorn of unnecessary details, facts to the extent relevant are that Petitioner was appointed as Lecturer [Assistant Professor (AGP Rs.7000/-)] in Business Studies on probation on 28.04.2009 in Business Studies in Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College/Respondent No.4 (hereinafter referred to as ‘College’). The College is a constituent college of University of Delhi/Respondent No. 3 and is fully funded by Government of NCT of Delhi/Respondent No. 2.

¶18

University Grants Commission (‘UGC’) issued a Merit Promotion Scheme, 1998/Career Advancement Scheme, 2000 (‘CAS’), providing for various stages of promotion to a Lecturer and the schemes were adopted by the University of Delhi and were thus applicable in the case of the Petitioner as well.

¶19

Petitioner became eligible for promotion from Assistant Professor (AGP Rs.7000/-) to Assistant Professor (AGP Rs.8000/-) on 30.04.2014 and to the post of Associate Professor on 30.04.2017 and from Associate Professor to Professor on 01.08.2021. Notwithstanding the fact that Petitioner became eligible for promotion to the higher posts on the aforesaid dates, College and the University did not take requisite steps to constitute Selection/Screening Committees until February, 2021, when Petitioner was considered for promotion as Assistant Professor (AGP Rs.8000/-) by the Selection Committee and consequent to favourable recommendation, was promoted vide order dated 13.12.2021 w.e.f. the date of eligibility i.e. 30.04.2014. Upon such promotion, Petitioner became entitled to enhanced salary and arrears but nothing was received by her.

¶20

It is further averred that Petitioner was considered for promotion to the post of Associate Professor by Screening Committee convened on

¶21

Signature Not Verified

¶22

W.P.(C) 13630/2024

¶23

Page 2 of 4

¶24

Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.10.2024 18:56:23

¶25

10.02.2021 and for post of Professor on 21.10.2021. By a common order dated 18.04.2022, promotion to the post of Associate Professor was granted w.e.f. 30.04.2017 and to the post of Professor w.e.f. 01.08.2021. Despite repeated representations, Petitioner was not paid the arrears of the re-fixation of her salary on account of these promotions.

¶26

Petitioner states that the College informed the Petitioner that the arrears will be released immediately after the fund is received from Respondent No. 2/Directorate of Higher Education but nothing has been received so far and compelled by the circumstance, Petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

¶27

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Petitioner has been gravely prejudiced as she was granted her due promotions belatedly and even after the grant of three promotions and passing an order fixing the pay of the Petitioner in the higher posts, arrears of pay fixation have not been released till date and Respondents are only shifting the blame on each other.

¶28

Issue notice.

¶29

Learned counsels, as above, accept notice on behalf of the Respondents.

¶30

Insofar as the College is concerned, the stand of Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni is that the College is willing to disburse the arrears but in the absence of provision in the Budget and allocation of funds from Respondents No. 1 and 2, it is unable to release the arrears. Insofar as Respondents No. 1 and 2 and Respondent No. 3 are concerned, the argument as usual is with regard to budgetary allocations.

¶31

The undisputed facts are that Petitioner was promoted to the post of Assistant Professor (AGP Rs.8000/-) w.e.f. 30.04.2014; to the post of

¶32

Signature Not Verified

¶33

W.P.(C) 13630/2024

¶34

Page 3 of 4

¶35

Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.10.2024 18:56:23

¶36

Associate Professor w.e.f. 30.04.2017 and to the post of Professor w.e.f. 01.08.2021. There can be no doubt that Petitioner is entitled to arrears of pay arising on account of re-fixation of her pay due to the promotions granted to her and it is also a hard reality that till date arrears have not been released to the Petitioner though none of the Respondents stand to deny her entitlement to receive the same. There is also no doubt that Petitioner has been denied her legitimate dues, a situation which cannot be countenanced in law and equity. The defence of the Respondents is clearly to put the blame on one and another. It is for the Respondents to put their house in order and ensure that employees do not suffer in the bargain.

¶37

In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Director (Higher Education) and the Principal of the College to convene a meeting within 3 weeks from the date of receipt of this order, to formalize and work out the modalities for releasing the arrears of pay fixation to the Petitioner. Once the decision is taken, the outstanding arrears towards principal amount shall be released within 3 months thereafter. It is left open to the Petitioner to make a representation for interest component due to delayed payment of the arrears, to the College and as and when the representation is received, the College shall take a decision in accordance with law.

¶38

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶39

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024

¶40

B.S. Rohella/shivam

¶41

Signature Not Verified

¶42

W.P.(C) 13630/2024

¶43

Page 4 of 4

¶44

Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.10.2024 18:56:23

Dr. Yogieta S Mehra v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Yogieta S Mehra v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baba Lease & Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 15(1), Delhi

Mercer Consulting (India) Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 16(1), Delhi & Ors.

A. K. Varshney Vs Union of India & Anr.

Jailender Kumar Singh Vs the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India & Ors.

Subedar Krishan Kumar Vs Union of India and Anr.

Nupur Agarwal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

M/S. Jindal Trading Co. through Its Proprietor Sh. Suresh Jindal Vs Commissioner, Delhi GST and Anr.

Geeta Kumari Vs State NCT of Delhi

Rahul Anand Vs Cement Corporation of India Limited

Amit Bainsla Vs National Hydroelectric Power Corporation through Director & Anr.

Prabhakar Kumar Vs University of Delhi and Ors.

Sh G L Gupta Vs Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

Deepak Kumar Jain and Ors. Vs Union of India

Dr Monika Bansal Vs Lt Governor of Delhi & Ors.