Disposed

Dr Aniruddha Narayan Malpani v. the Union of India

Delhi HC23 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/13290/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a single-line order permitting the withdrawal of a writ petition (W.P.(C) 13290/2024) subject to a liberty to file a representation with the respondent. The application was disposed of without the court commenting on the merits of the controversy.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of writ petition allowed with liberty to file a representation with the Union of India.

Dr Aniruddha Narayan Malpani Vs the Union of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~47

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13290/2024

¶4

DR ANIRUDDHA NARAYAN MALPANI .....Petitioner Through: None

¶5

versus

¶6

THE UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms.Arunima Dwivedi (CGSC) with Mr. Akash Pathak, Advocate for UOI

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶8

O R D E R % 07.10.2024

¶9

CM APPL. 59076/2024

¶10

Present application has been filed on behalf of counsel for Respondent/UOI for marking of appearance in the order dated 23^rd September, 2024.

¶11

Keeping in view the averments in the present application, the same is allowed and the order dated 23^rd September, 2024 shall now read as under:

¶12

“ $~62

¶13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶14

+ W.P.(C) 13290/2024 & CM APPL. 55508/2024 DR ANIRUDDHA NARAYAN MALPANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mohini Priya and Ms. Sayesha Gambhir, Advocates

¶15

versus

¶16

THE UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent

¶17

Through: Ms.Arunima Dwivedi (CGSC) with Ms.Pinky Pawar (GP) for UOI .

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 16:40:37

¶19

CORAM:

¶20

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R

¶21

% 23.09.2024

¶22

1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a representation with the Union of India.

¶23

2. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition and application stand disposed of.

¶24

3. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

¶25

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶26

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶27

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 Aj" ”

¶28

Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

¶29

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶30

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶31

OCTOBER 7, 2024 ms

¶32

Dr Aniruddha Narayan Malpani v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Aniruddha Narayan Malpani v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh. Anil Vohra Vs East Delhi Municipal Corporation Delhi and Ors.

Gnctd and Ors. Vs Amar Singh Chauhan

Shaikh Mujibur Raheman Vs Jamia Millia Islamia and Ors.

Dr. P. Puneeth Vs Jawaharlal Nehru University & Anr.

Vipul Mittal Vs Union Bank of India & Ors.

Hilbert Innovations Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

M/S Ndcon Constructions Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Ors.

Rajeev Gandhi Jan Sewa Samiti through Its President Sh. Ravi Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority

Kopek Polyplast Vs Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Icici Bank Limited

M/S Scc Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India through Its Secreatry Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways & Ors.

Ashish Malik Vs Union of India & Ors.

Union Ofindia Vs Mr Mohit Jitendra Kukadia

Surjit Singh Yadav Vs Union of India and Anr.