The High Court dismissed the present writ petition as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners, with liberty to file a review application before the Tribunal. Pending applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ....Petitioners
Through: Mr. RV Sinha, Mr. Amit Sinha & Ms. Shriya Sharma, Advocates
versus
RAVINDER KUMAR & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R
% 19.09.2024
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2024/rk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:03:15
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
RAVINDER KUMAR & ANR.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
GIRISH KATHPALIA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
