Writ petition concerning an examination; petitioner, having not qualified the examination, sought to withdraw the petition. The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and pending applications as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, SPC and Mr.Abhishek Gupta, GP with Ms. Samiksha, Advocate for UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that, as the petitioner has not qualified the examination, he shall withdraw the petition.
Petition as well as pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
JANUARY 12, 2024/rr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 13:06:09
MOHIT
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
