Disposed

Ranbir Rattan Bhardwaj v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/12771/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of W.P.(C) 12771/2024 by accepting the respondents' fair stand that they would consider the petitioner's claim for increments based on an Apex Court decision within eight weeks through reasoned orders.

What did the court decide?

The respondents to consider the petitioner's claim regarding increments within eight weeks by passing reasoned and speaking orders.

Ranbir Rattan Bhardwaj Vs Union of India & Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~59

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12771/2024

¶4

RANBIR RATTAN BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Tiwari and Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anju Gupta, Ms. Yashaswi and Mr. S.K. Chochsey, Advs. for UOI.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 11.09.2024

¶12

CM APPL. 53196/2024 (exemption)

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

The application stands disposed of.

¶15

W.P.(C) 12771/2024

¶16

The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to grant him his due increments in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P.Mundinamani & Ors. [Civil Appeal No.2471/2023].

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the present, the petitioner will be satisfied, in case, the respondents are directed to examine

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:26:00

¶20

their claims in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors.(supra) in a time bound manner.

¶21

Issue notice. Ms. Anju Gupta, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and he has no objection if the petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to take a final decision regarding the petitioner’s claim in a time bound manner.

¶22

In the light of this fair stand taken by the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim as raised in the present petition within a period of eight weeks from today by passing reasoned and speaking orders qua the petitioner.

¶23

Needless to state while taking a decision on the petitioner’s claim, the respondents will, take into account the decision dated 11.04.2023 of the Apex Court in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. (supra) read with the clarificatory order passed by the Apex Court on 06.09.2023 in S.L.P. (C) 4722/2021. It is further made clear that, in case, the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the respondents, it will be open for him to seek legal recourse as permissible in law.

¶24

REKHA PALLI, J

¶25

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶26

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024/ sds

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:26:00

Ranbir Rattan Bhardwaj v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranbir Rattan Bhardwaj v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suyasha Sharma Vs National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences & Ors.

DDA Vs Vaibhav Malik & Ors.

Kamal Kumar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Gurudwara Shree Guru Singh Sabha through Its President Sh. G. S. Chhatwal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Omkar Gupta Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Dinmani Sharma Vs Principal District and Sessions Judge & Ors.

Harsh Patuna & Ors. Vs National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.

Dr. Saiqa Ikram Vs Jamia Millia Islamia and Ors.

Nagendra Tiwari Vs Union of India & Ors.

Satpal Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Durga Prasad Ojha Vs Union of India & Anr.

Manju Yadav Vs Rajesh Yadav & Anr.

Maj Gurjeet Singh Kaler Vs Union of India & Ors.

Deepak Chaturvedi Vs Union of India and Ors.