Writ petition dismissed as abated since the petitioner failed to bring the deceased respondent's legal representatives on record despite a last opportunity, and counsel had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Devvrat Yadav, Adv.
versus
SMT. SUNHERI DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Ms. Divya Aggarwal, Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Ms. Kritika Maita, Ms. Tanya Rose and Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R % 04.10.2024
1. Despite grant of last opportunity, the petitioner has not taken steps to bring the legal representatives of the deceased respondent on record.
2. Mr. Soni, learned CGSC for the petitioner, submits that he has no further instructions in this matter.
3. The writ petition cannot, therefore, continue against a dead person. It is dismissed accordingly.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J.
OCTOBER 4, 2024/ VLD
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 16:41:06
Union of India
Smt. Sunheri Devi
C. HARI SHANKAR
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
