The Acting Chief Justice disposed of the existing writ petition in similar terms to a related matter, directing the DRAT to proceed with hearing an early application, while explicitly leaving parties' rights and contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~110
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arani Mukherjee, Advocate
versus
CLASSIQUE INTERNATIONAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pallav Saxena, Mr. Nipun Sharma, Mr. Mohammad Nausheen Samar, Mr. Diwaker Goel, Ms. Shruti Nayar and Ms.Akriti Singh, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
%
O R D E R 09.09.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 /ms
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:42:55
Indian Overseas Bank
Classique International & Anr.
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
