Disposed

Manohar Bachani v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/12398/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition by a licensee seeking extension to operate a railway Multi Purpose Stall after expiry. Relying on extensions granted in comparable matters (L.P.A 767/2024 and SLP 19229/2024), court allowed operation for seven months from 02.08.2024 and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed to operate the MPS for seven months beyond expiry of licence on 02.08.2024.

Manohar Bachani Vs Union of India & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12398/2024, CM APPL. 51573/2024

¶4

MANOHAR BACHANI .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Tamim Qadri, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, SPC, Mr. Vidur Dwivedi, G.P. Mr. Shakir Shabir, Advs.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 11.09.2024

¶12

On 05.09.2024, the Court directed the learned counsel for the respondents to take instructions and to assist as to why the benefit which was extended by the Supreme Court in SLP No.19229/2024 is not extendable to the present petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in the instant case, fresh process for re-allotment of the Multi Purpose Stall (hereinafter ‘MPS’) has already been issued on 24.08.2024.

¶13

He, therefore, submits that the petitioner can participate in the fresh process for re-allotment and the respondents are willing to consider his application for the MPS.

¶14

Learned counsel who appears for the petitioner, on the other hand, places on record the copy of the letter dated 07.09.2024 issued by South Western Railway, to indicate that under similar circumstances as the petitioner herein, when the MPS was already handed over to the respondents, in light of the order of the Division Bench of this Court in

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:27:10

¶17

L.P.A No.850/2024 which granted four months’ extension, the stall was reallocated to the said licensee in the LPA therein.

¶18

Let the communication dated 07.09.2024 be placed in the digital record of the Court.

¶19

In view of the aforesaid, the Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner in the instant case can also be granted the extension of three months’ time which was granted in L.P.A 767/2024, and four months in S.L.P No. 19229/2024.

¶20

Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of, alongwith all pending applications, with the direction to allow the petitioner to operate the said MPS for a further period of seven months from the date of expiry of the license i.e., 02.08.2024.

¶21

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶22

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024/KG

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/09/2024 at 12:27:10

Manohar Bachani v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manohar Bachani v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suyasha Sharma Vs National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences & Ors.

DDA Vs Vaibhav Malik & Ors.

Kamal Kumar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Gurudwara Shree Guru Singh Sabha through Its President Sh. G. S. Chhatwal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Omkar Gupta Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Dinmani Sharma Vs Principal District and Sessions Judge & Ors.

Harsh Patuna & Ors. Vs National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.

Dr. Saiqa Ikram Vs Jamia Millia Islamia and Ors.

Rajni Chaudhary Vs Usha Devi

Gurudwara Shree Guru Singh Sabha through Its President Sh. G. S. Chhatwal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

M/S Vidhi Enterprises Vs Hindustan Lever Ltd.

Sanjay Yadav Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Murari Lal Bansal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Dan Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.