Petitioner filed an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. The Court disposed of the application and the present writ petition accordingly.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed with liberty to file fresh petition on same cause of action; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ S-44
SIDMAN INDUSTRIES
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Navneet, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Shashank Garg, CGSC with Mr.Raghav Bhatia, Ms.Nishtha Jain, Mr.Jitendra Kumar Tripathi and Ms.Aradhya Chaturvedi, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Gopesh Jindal, Advocate. Mr.Sangram Patnaik, Advocate with Ms.Swayam Sidha Patnaik, Mr.Sohel Rishabh, Mr.Ruchir Batra, Mr.Manish K.Mathur, Advocates for R-1 & 8 to 30 along with Mr.Divyanshu Dubey (General Manager) and Mr.Harsh Patidar (Deputy Manager). Mr.Himanshu Kasturi, Advocate for R-5&6.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
% 10.09.2024
CM APPL.52892/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:25:34
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 TS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:25:34
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
