Disposed

M/S R. R. Trends Pvt. Ltd. v. Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas and Ors.

Delhi HC2 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/12186/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging the closure of the petitioner's unit for operating an unauthorized boiler, the court disposed of the petition by issuing directions for the pollution control board to inspect the premises and verify the removal of the boiler. The court left the question of maintainability and merits open.

What did the court decide?

The U.P. Pollution Control Board to inspect the premises to verify removal of the 400 Kg/hr boiler; if removed, directions for resumption of operations to be issued.

M/S R. R. Trends Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commission for… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~89

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 12186/2024, CM APPL. 50691-50692/2024

¶4

M/S R. R. TRENDS PVT. LTD.

¶5

.....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Mr. Prateek Bhalla, Ms. Mallika Chadha, Mr. Rupal, Gupta, Ms. Sana Singh and Mr. Arjan, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

COMMISSION FOR AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION AND ADJOINING AREAS AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Mr. Himanshu, GP with Mr. Rahul Bhaskar, Advocate for R-3.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 02.09.2024

¶12

The present petition assails order dated 29^th August, 2024,¹ passed by Respondent No. 1/ Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas, ordering closure of the Petitioner’s operations and directing Respondent No. 4/ Pashchimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited to disconnect power supply to the Petitioner’s unit. By virtue of this order, the Petitioner has been called upon to adopt certain corrective and preventive measures.

¶13

1 “the impugned decision”

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:58:19

¶15

The brief background asserted by the Petitioner for filing of the present petition is as follows:

¶16

2.1. The Petitioner, engaged in the business of manufacturing and exporting garments, operates its business using machinery such as generators and boilers. By way of a Consent Order dated 23rd July, 2020, Respondent No. 2/ the U.P. Pollution Control Board, granted permission to the Petitioner to use a boiler with a capacity of 300 Kg/hr.

¶17

2.2 In April, 2024, the Petitioner purchased an additional PNG boiler with a capacity of 400 Kg/hr. Since this new boiler was not being used, the Petitioner did not seek a consent order for its operation.

¶18

2.3 On 27^th July, 2024, a flying squad conducted an inspection at the Petitioner’s unit. Based on their report, a closure direction dated 29^th August, 2024, was issued under Section 12(2)(xi) of the Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas Act, 2021. The closure was ordered on the grounds that the Petitioner’s unit lacked the necessary consent for the second boiler. Consequently, the Petitioner was directed to cease all industrial operations.

¶19

In this context, Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Counsel for the Petitioner, argues that the impugned decision was made without issuing a prior show cause notice or providing the Petitioner with a copy of the flying squad’s inspection report, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. He submits that the decision has severely impacted the Petitioner’s livelihood and that of 500 employees, as it has brought the Petitioner’s business operations to a standstill. Furthermore, he contends, on instructions, that the second boiler has already been dismantled and will be removed from the premises by the end of the day. He urges that the Respondents can conduct a

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:58:19

¶22

fresh inspection to verify the removal to allow resumption of their activities. 4. Per contra, counsel for Respondent No. 3, at the outset, objects to the maintainability of the present petition, arguing that the impugned decision is appealable under Section 18 of the Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas Act, 2021 before the National Green Tribunal. He further points out the Petitioner’s admission in paragraph No. 7 of the petition, where it is stated:

¶23

“Although it was meant for the new unit which is currently being set up, the Petitioner also thought that it would be able to use the new boiler even at the current manufacturing unit if the first boiler again breaks down, thereby serving both purposes.”

¶24

Based on this admission, the counsel submits that the Petitioner must adhere to the requirements of the Act and contends that the impugned order has no infirmity.

¶25

The Court has heard the counsel for both parties. It is observed that the impugned direction arises from an inspection conducted by the Enforcement Task Force, constituted by the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas, based on a report submitted by the flying squad. Apparently, when the flying squad visited the Petitioner’s premises they found two boilers with capacities of 300 Kg/hr and 400 Kg/hr. Notably, the 400 Kg/hr boiler is not listed in the Consent Order dated 23^rd July, 2020. Nonetheless, in light of the statement made by Mr. Hariharan, and considering the Petitioner’s conciliatory approach, the Court finds it appropriate, while keeping the question of maintainability open and without delving into the merits of the case, to issue the following directions:

¶26

a. The U.P. Pollution Control Board, Gautam Budh Nagar, is directed to

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:58:19

¶29

inspect the Petitioner’s premises tomorrow, i.e., on 03^rd September, 2024, to verify whether the PNG boiler with a capacity of 400 Kg/hr has been dismantled and removed by the Petitioner.

¶30

b. If it is found that the boiler has been removed, appropriate directions for the resumption of the Petitioner’s unit shall be issued, along with any consequential directions to Respondent No. 4.

¶31

c. In the event that any Environmental Compensation (EC) charges are leviable, Respondent No. 2 shall communicate the same to the Petitioner, who shall then be at liberty to seek appropriate recourse against such charges.

¶32

The Court has not commented on the merits of the case. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.

¶33

With the above directions, the present petition along with pending applications, if any, is disposed of.

¶34

This order be given dasti under the signatures of Court Master.

¶35

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶36

SEPTEMBER 2, 2024 nk

¶37

This is a digitally signed order.

¶38

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:58:19

M/S R. R. Trends Pvt. Ltd. v. Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S R. R. Trends Pvt. Ltd. v. Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Association of Postal Employees Group C Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vinay Vs Union of India and Ors.

Pravin Singhal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Cats Ambulance Staff Union & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ravinder Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Dr. Ashwani Kumar Vs M. L. Khanna Dav Public School & Anr.

Deepak Kumar Verma Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Harshpal Singh Negi Vs Sant Mary School Safdarjung Enclave and Ors.

Lucky Pharma Logistics Private Limited Vs Lieutenant Governor, Gnctd & Ors.

Kanwalpreet Singh & Ors. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Poonam Chaudhary & Anr. Vs Preeti Chaudhary & Anr.

Gail Gas Limited Vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council District South West Delhi & Anr.

Jet Airways India Limited Vs Naveen Rai & Anr.

Harisul Haq Vs Jamia Millia Islamia & Ors.