Petitioner seeks withdrawal of writ petition claiming it has become infructuous. Court withdraws and disposes of the petition. No substantive legal issue decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KRITIKA GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Prakriti Anand, Advocate
versus
MEDICAL COUNCIL COMMITTEE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 01.02.2024
1. Ms. Prakriti Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the writ petition stating that it has become infructuous.
2. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
FEBRUARY 1, 2024 yg
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:56:11
KRITIKA GUPTA
MEDICAL COUNCIL COMMITTEE
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
