Single judge order quashing a Writ Petition filed by an taxpayer as infructuous since the petitioner had successfully obtained an Advance Ruling from the Board, rendering the writ application unnecessary.
The writ petition was disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~76
WOODWARD INC ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vishal Kalra, Advocate
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE 1(1) (1) NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Sr. SC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 01.04.2024
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
APRIL 01, 2024 p’ma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2024 at 12:05:34
WOODWARD INC
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) & ANR
YAGYESHWANT VARMA
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
