Petitioner sought clarification on a paragraph of a prior judgment. The court held the paragraph was self-explanatory, no clarification needed, and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-1
MS ASANDAS AND SONS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr Sujit Ghosh, Sr Advocate, Ms Mannat Waraich, Mr Ashray Behura, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ......Respondents Through: Mr. Vidur Dwivedi, Govt. Pleader, Ms. Pooja Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Manish Guruwal, Under SecyMinistry of Food Processing Industries Mr. R.P. Aggarwal with Mr. Chandan Kumar Jha, Advs for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 09.01.2025
CM APPL. 68308/2024
This application has been filed by the Petitioner seeking clarifications regarding paragraph No.30 of the Judgment dated 27.05.2024.
Paragraph No.30 of the Judgment dated 27.05.2024 is self explanatory and does not require any clarification.
It is open for the Petitioner to take such steps as may be available to the Petitioner under law.
The Application is dismissed.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
JANUARY 09, 2025/ Rahul
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 21:52:21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether clarification of a self-explanatory para in the judgment dated 27.05.2024 is necessary.
MS Asandas and Sons Pvt Ltd
Union of India
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
