Petitioner withdrew its writ petition for want of territorial jurisdiction, with liberty to pursue the dispute before the competent authority having jurisdiction.
Liberty to initiate appropriate legal proceedings before the competent authority having jurisdiction; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~91
ESHAKTI.COM PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Santanam Swaminandhan, Ms. Abhilasha Shrawat and Mr. Darsh Bansal, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Ms. Vidhika Kapoor, Ms. Pooja Bhardwaj and Mr. Hussain Taqvi, Advocates for R-1/UOI Mr. Anshul Rawat and Mr. Saurabh George, Advocates for R-2 & 3
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R
% 27.08.2024 CM APPL. 48637/2024 (exemption)
W.P.(C) 11700/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2024 at 11:38:47
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
AUGUST 27, 2024 N/TK/AM
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2024 at 11:38:47
Esakti.com Private Limited
Union of India
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
