The petitioner filed a writ petition alleging illegal activities by the respondents. The court characterized the petition as a gross abuse of the process of law. Upon the petitioner's request, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~96
DINESH BHAGAT .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Akash Chatterjee, Mr.Pranav Gupta, Mr.Siddhant Verma, Advocates.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
.....Respondent Through: Mr.Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms.Urvashi, Mr.Sparsh Agarwal and Mr.Gauravdeep Singh Bahl, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R
% 23.08.2024
CM APPL. 48532/2024 – EXMP.
W.P.(C) 11677/2024
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
AUGUST 23, 2024/ VLD
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2024 at 12:33:47
Dinesh Bhagat
Delhi Development Authority
Anr.
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
