The court allowed an application filed by the petitioner to withdraw the main writ petition, ordering its disposal as withdrawn after finding that the prayed relief was granted.
Petitioner's application to withdraw the petition is allowed; main petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~223
AKASH VERMA .....Petitioner
Through: Adv. (appearance not given) versus
UNION OF INDIA THRU D.G. R.P.F. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Akash Mishra, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R % 23.12.2024
CM APPL.75966/2024
W.P.(C) 11546/2022
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
DECEMBER 23, 2024/ab/sk/as
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:05:15
Akash Verma
Union of India Through D.G. R.P.F.
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
