Rajiv Panchal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as the petitioner had expired and no application was made by legal representatives to continue the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
RAJIV PANCHAL .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Badar Mahmood, SC for MCD. Mr.Jitender Saini and Mr.Shalinder Saini, Advs for R-2. Mr.G.K.Kaushik and Mr.B.S.Kain, Advs for R-2. ASI Vikendra PS Jamia Nagar.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 19.09.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:29:13
Rajiv Panchal
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court