The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition. The respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, vacated the interim order, and closed the pending interlocutory application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
M/S. MICRO LABS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms Archana Sahadeva, Adv.
versus
DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Abhay Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 2/UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 11.09.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024/ aj
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:53:47
M/S. MICRO LABS LIMITED
DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA
ANR.
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
