Disposed

Pardeep Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC6 Dec 2024W.P.(C)/10761/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A street vendor petitioned for release of confiscated vending goods, restoration to his original vending space, and compensation from the MCD. The court recorded that the goods had been released during the pendency of proceedings, noted the MCD's statement that he may vend subject to TVC terms and conditions, and disposed of the writ petition without further directions.

What the court decided

AI extract

Pardeep Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi… — Municipal and Town Planning | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~25

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 10761/2023

¶4

PARDEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR.

¶7

.....Respondents Through: Ms. Aarushi Tiku, Adv. for MCD Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Shweta Singh, Adv. for MCD Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jha, Adv. for SHO, Delhi Police

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶10

¶11

O R D E R 06.12.2024

¶12

This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following

¶13

reliefs:-

¶14

“a.) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent No. 1 to release the petitioner’s vending goods & all its belongings;

¶15

b.) issue the writ in nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to restore the petitioner to its original vending space with dignity i.e. Shop at Narela Zone, Ward 32-N in Shahbad Dairy, New Delhi-110042;

¶16

c.) issue the writ in nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the compensation to the petitioner for illegally confiscation act done by the respondent;

¶17

d.) Allow the present writ petition with exemplary cost.

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 21:02:28

¶19

e.) pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble court may consider fit and proper necessary in the interest of justice.”

¶20

During the pendency of these proceedings, we are informed that the goods and articles which had been seized have been duly released. That only leaves us to examine relief (b) as was claimed.

¶21

Ms. Tiku, learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi [“ MCD ”] states that subject to the petitioner conforming with the terms and conditions of the Town Vending Committee [“ TVC ”], they would have no objection to him undertaking his vending activity in accordance with law.

¶22

In view of the statement so made, we find that no further directions are warranted. The writ petition shall stand disposed of on the above terms.

¶23

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

¶24

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶25

DECEMBER 06, 2024 sp

¶26

Pardeep Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Pardeep Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritu Singhal Vs Lions Public School and Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs SL-3939F Col Mpc Rao (Retd.)

Abhishek Monga Vs Delhi Develoment Authority

Ca. Munish Mehta Vs Board of Discipline of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Thread and Needles and Anr. Vs Canara Bank and Anr.

Nidhi Varma Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Shailaja Menon Vs Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Delhi & Ors.

Nanda Agrawal Vs University of Delhi & Ors.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (CENTRAL)-2 Vs Havells India Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi Vs India International Centre

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi Vs India Habitat Centre

Vmvs Textiles Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 26(1) & Anr.

Ashish Kumar Shukla Proprietor S.P.S Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry Vs Union of India & Ors.