High Court Delhi dismissed a writ petition (C) 10754/2021 in default for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates and was represented from previous orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
PRASHANT KUMAR VIDYARTHI .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Ms. Aishani Mohan and Mr. Samarth Talesaka, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 10.12.2024
List on 06.05.2024.”
2. Subsequently on 6th May, 2024 and 23rd August, 2024, there was no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner. The position remains the same even today.
3. In the interest of justice, no adverse orders are being passed today.
4. Renotify on 10th December, 2024.”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 12:00:55
SANJEEV NARULA, J
DECEMBER 10, 2024 d.negi
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 12:00:55
Prashant Kumar Vidyarthi
Union of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
