The petitioner expressed satisfaction with steps taken by the respondent Corporation. Reserving liberty to re-agitate, the High Court disposed of the writ petition.
Petition disposed with liberty to re-agitate grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
SANJAY SHARMA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nishant Anand Ms. Gunjan Bansal Anand, Mr. Kushank Khari, Mr. Naman Singhal, Advocates.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 01.08.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 1, 2024/KG
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:56:20
Sanjay Sharma
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Purushaindra Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
