Attar Singh v. Nitin Shokeen & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
One-line order recording no appearance by the petitioner. The court deferred adverse orders in the interest of justice and listed the matter for the subsequent date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- C.R.P. 106/2023
ATTAR SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: None
versus
NITIN SHOKEEN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Choudhary, Adv. Respondent No. 2 (through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 07.03.2025
CM APPL. 71986/2024 (for restoration) in C.R.P. 106/2023
- None appears for the petitioner.
- In the interest of justice, adverse orders are deferred.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Attar Singh
- respondent
Nitin Shokeen & Anr.
Coram
Amit Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Neena Bansal Krishna
- Order 2 · Neena Bansal Krishna
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court