Petitioner sought directions in an already disposed of writ petition against AICTE. The court declined to entertain the grievance but granted liberty to pursue appropriate legal recourse.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
SREE VYSHNAVI MBA COLLEGE .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mayank Manish and Mr. Ravi Kant, Advs.
versus
ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Adv. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
% 18.11.2024
CM APPL. 52900/2024 (filed by the petitioner for directions)
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
NOVEMBER 18, 2024/p
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:30:00
Sree Vyshnavi MBA College
All India Council for Technical Education
Anr.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
