The single judge bench disposed of a writ petition challenging a procurement tender, ruling that the matter had become infructuous as the tender was awarded on 6th September 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S MP TYAGI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS.....Petitioner Through: None
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC alongwith Mr. Zubin Singh, Mr. Akash Mishra and Ms. Rashi Kapoor, Advocates for UOI/R-1 to R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 22.10.2024
MANMOHAN, CJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
OCTOBER 22, 2024 kct
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/10/2024 at 12:53:12
M/S MP TYAGI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS
UNION OF INDIA
Tushar Rao Gedela
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
