Telecom companies sought withdrawal of writ petitions challenging a circular, citing conflicting interim orders in different High Courts. The Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to approach other High Courts and extended existing interim protection by six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62 & 63
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:07:18
Waize Ali Noor, Ms. Shreya V. Mehra, Ms. Vidhi Jain, Mr. Kartik Baijal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 31.01.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
JANUARY 31, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:07:18
Tata Teleservices Limited
Union of India
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
