The petitioner filed a petition seeking probate of a will. The court held it was not maintainable as the petitioner was not the named executor under Section 222 of the Indian Succession Act. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
SMT. MINAKSHI KASHYAP ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate.
versus
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 07.02.2020
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2020 ‘pv’/s
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who is not the named executor of the will, is maintainable to seek probate under Section 222 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
Whether to grant leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Minakshi Kashyap
State & Ors.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
