The High Court of Delhi dismissed an eviction petition filed by the Petitioner (North Delhi Municipal Corporation) as withdrawn. The Petitioner undertook to vacate the premises by 31.05.2020.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; execution of impugned order stayed till 31.05.2020 subject to filing of affidavit of undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Petitioner
versus
INDU MITTAL & ORS. ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, North DMC with Ms. Khushboo Nahar, Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advocates Mr. Bihari Shah, School Inspector, City SP Zone, North NDMC. For the Respondent: Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sunil Mittal, Advocates
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)
RC.REV. 31/2017
Page 1 of 3
Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from ground floor and mezzanine floor of property bearing No. 1758, Gali Kuan Wali, Rang Mahal, S.P. Mukherjee Marg, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition.
RC.REV. 31/2017
Page 2 of 3
electricity and other dues/charges, if any, in respect of the tenanted premises before the petitioner vacates the premises on or before 31.05.2020.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 07, 2020 ‘ rs’
RC.REV. 31/2017
Page 3 of 3
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Indu Mittal & Ors.
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
